10.14 Propositions and Quantifiers
Propositions
Definition
It's a sentence that must be true or false
Denotation
\(P,Q,R\) as propositions
SYMBOL | IT READS | NAME | TRUE IF | FALSE IF |
---|---|---|---|---|
\(\sim P\) | not \(P\) | the negation of \(P\) | If \(P\) is F | \(P\) is True |
\(P\wedge Q\) | \(P\) and \(Q\) | conjunction | If both \(P\) and \(Q\) are true | otherwise |
\(P\vee Q\) | \(P\) or \(Q\) | disjunction | otherwise | \(P\) and \(Q\) are both false |
\(P\Rightarrow Q\) | If \(P\) then \(Q\) | conditional | otherwise | \(P\) is true and \(Q\) is false |
\(P\Leftrightarrow Q\) | \(P\) iff Q (if and only if) | biconditional | \(P\) and \(Q\) are true or \(P\) and \(Q\) are false | otherwise |
Terminology (术语) for conditional
\(P\Rightarrow Q\) (\(P\) is antecedent and \(Q\) is consequent) \(\begin{cases}Q\Rightarrow P\text { the converse}\\\sim Q\Rightarrow \sim P\text{ the contrapositive}\end{cases}\)
The contrapositive is equivalent to the original proposition
Propositional forms
They are sentences like \(P\vee Q,P\wedge Q\vee R,...\) which don't have true or false
They will become propositions (have true or false) when we replace the denotation like above with real propositions
Note
but, while, and although are usually translated into conjunction since they have the same meaning as and.
Truth table
\(P\) | \(\sim P\) |
---|---|
T | F |
F | T |
\(P\) | \(Q\) | \(P\wedge Q\) | \(P \vee Q\) | \(P\Rightarrow Q\) | \(P\Leftrightarrow Q\) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
T | T | T | T | T | T |
T | F | F | T | F | F |
F | T | F | T | T | F |
F | F | F | F | T | T |
Tautology
It is a propositional form whose truth table has only true
Example
\(P\) | \(\sim P\) | \(P~~\vee \sim P\) |
---|---|---|
T | F | T |
F | T | T |
Contradiction
It is a propositional form that is always false
Example
\(P\) | \(\sim P\) | \(P~~\wedge\sim P\) |
---|---|---|
T | F | F |
F | T | F |
Equivalence of propositions
Two propositions are equivalent if they have the same truth table
We denote it as \(\equiv\) (equivalent)
Theorem
1
-
\(\sim(\sim P)\equiv P\)
-
\(P\wedge Q\equiv Q\wedge P\)
-
\(P\vee Q\equiv Q\vee P\)
-
\(P\vee(Q\vee R)\equiv\left(P\vee Q\right)\vee R\)
-
\(P\wedge(Q\wedge R)\equiv\left(P\wedge Q\right)\wedge R\)
-
\(P\wedge(Q\vee R)\equiv\left(P\wedge Q\right)\vee\left(P\wedge R\right)\)
-
\(P\vee(Q\wedge R)\equiv\left(P\vee Q\right)\wedge\left(P\vee R\right)\)
-
\(\sim(P\vee Q)\equiv\left(\sim P\right)\wedge\left(\sim Q\right)\)
-
\(\sim(P\wedge Q)\equiv\left(\sim P\right)\vee\left(\sim Q\right)\)
6 and 7 are distributive laws
8 and 9 are De Morgan's laws
All can be proved by truth table easily
Application
It is useful to write negations
Either '\(2^{16}+1\) is prime' or 'it is divisible by \(7\)' but 'it is not divisible by \(49\)'
The form is \(P\vee(Q~~\wedge \sim R)\)
Then, write a negation
\(\sim\left(P\vee(Q~~\wedge\sim R\right))\equiv\sim P\wedge\sim\left(Q\wedge\sim R\right)\equiv\sim P\wedge\left(\sim Q\vee\sim\left(\sim R\right)_{}\right)\\\equiv\sim P\wedge\left(\sim Q\vee R\right)\equiv\left(\sim P\right)\wedge\left(\sim Q\right)\vee\left(\sim P\right)\wedge R\)
Into natural sentence: '\(2^{16}+1\) is not prime' and 'it is not divisible by \(7\)' or '\(2^{16}+1\) is not prime' and 'it is not divisible by \(49\)'
2
From Denotation we can conclude that: \(P\Rightarrow Q\equiv \sim P\vee Q\)
"If \(P\) then \(Q\)" can be seen as saying either "\(P\) is false" or "\(Q\) is true" (i.e., \(\sim P\) or \(Q\)).
-
\(P\Rightarrow Q\equiv\sim Q\Rightarrow\sim P\equiv\sim P\vee Q\)
-
\(\sim\left(P\Rightarrow Q\right)\equiv P\wedge\sim Q\)
-
\(P\Leftrightarrow Q\equiv\left(P\Rightarrow Q\right)\wedge\left(Q\Rightarrow P\right)\)
-
\(P\Rightarrow\left(Q\Rightarrow R\right)\equiv\left(P\wedge Q\right)\Rightarrow R\)
-
\(P\Rightarrow\left(Q\wedge R\right)\equiv\left(P\Rightarrow Q\right)\wedge\left(P\Rightarrow R\right)\)
-
\(P\Rightarrow\left(Q\vee R\right)\equiv\left(P\Rightarrow Q\right)\vee\left(P\Rightarrow R\right)\)
Quantifiers
Definition
Open propositions
Sentences like "\(x^2>3\)", "\(x^2+y^2=1\)"
Universe of diverse of an open proposition
\(P(x)\). It is a set \(A\) such that \(P(a)\) is a proposition whenever \(a\in A\)
The set \(\left\lbrace a\in A:P\left(a\right)\text{ is true}\right\rbrace\) is called the true set
Example
\(P(x):"x^2>3"\)
Universe \(\N\) and true set is \(\left\lbrace2,3,4,\ldots\right\rbrace\)
Universe \(\R\) and true set is \((\sqrt3,\infty)\)
Equivalence of open propositions
If two open propositions have the same true set (in that universe), they are equivalent in a given universe.
or
If two open propositions are equivalent, they are equivalent in any universe.
Example
Consider \("x^2<1"\) and \("x=0"\)
True set of \("x^2<1"\) | True set of \("x=0"\) | Equivalent over ... | |
---|---|---|---|
over \(\Z\) | \(\left\lbrace0\right\rbrace\) | \(\left\lbrace0\right\rbrace\) | \(\checkmark\) |
over \(\R\) | \((-1,1)\) | \(\left\lbrace0\right\rbrace\) | \(×\) |
\("x^2<1"\) and \("x=0"\) are not equivalent
Quantified propositions
Given an open \(P(x)\) and a universe \(U\), we define
PROPOSITION | HOW IT READS | WHEN IT IS TRUE |
---|---|---|
\((\exists x)P(x)\) | There exists \(x\in U\) such that \(P(x)\) | True set \(\neq \emptyset\) |
\((\forall x)P(x)\) | For all \(x\in U\), \(P(x)\) or For any \(x\in U\), \(P(x)\) | True set \(= U\) |
\((\exists!x)P(x)\) | There is a unique \(x\) in \(U\), such that \(P(x)\) | True set has only one element |
\((\exists!x)A(x)\text{ is equivalent to }(\exists x)A(x)\wedge(\forall y)(\forall z)(A(y)\wedge A(z)\Rightarrow y=z)\)
Some names
\(\exists\) existential quantifier
\(\forall\) universal quantifier
\(\exists !\) unique existential quantifier
Example
-
\(\left(\exists x\right)x^2=1\begin{cases}\text{True if universe is }\mathbb{N}\\ \text{False if universe is \textbraceleft2,3,4\textbraceright}\end{cases}\)
-
\(\left(\exists!x\right)x^2=1\begin{cases}\text{True if universe is }\mathbb{N}\\ \text{False if universe is }\Z\end{cases}\)
Equivalence of quantified sentence
If two quantified sentences have the same true value (in that universe), they are equivalent in a given universe.
or
If two quantified sentences are equivalent in all universe, they are equivalent.
Example
\(\left(\forall x\right)x>1\) and \(\left(\forall x\right)x\geq2\begin{cases}\text{in }\R \text{ they are equivalent since they are both false }\\\text{in }(1,\infty) \text{ they are not equivalent}\end{cases}\)
Theorem
-
\(\sim (\forall x)P(x)\equiv (\exists x)\sim P(x)\)
-
\(\sim(\exists x)P(x)\equiv(\forall x)\sim P(x)\)
Example
Write a denial for "All primes are odd"
\(\left(\forall x\in Z\right)\left(x~prime\Rightarrow x~is~odd\right)\)
\(\left(\forall x\right)\left(P\left(x\right)\Rightarrow Q\left(x\right)\right)\)
\(\sim(\forall x)(P\left(x)\right.\Rightarrow Q(x))\equiv(\exists x)(\sim(P(x)\Rightarrow Q(x)))\equiv(\exists x)(P(x)\land\sim Q(x))\)
Into English: There exists an integer \(x\) that is prime but it is not odd.